# Modeling a Mixture in Traditional Representation

When modeling mixtures, we are often faced with a large set of ingredients to choose
from. A common way to formalize this type of selection problem is to assign each
ingredient its own numerical parameter representing the amount of the ingredient in
the mixture. A sum constraint imposed on all parameters then ensures that the total
amount of ingredients in the mix is always 100%. In addition, there could be other
constraints, for instance, to impose further restrictions on individual subgroups of
ingredients. In BayBE's language, we call this the *traditional mixture
representation*.

In this example, we demonstrate how to create a search space in this representation,
using a simple mixture of up to six components, which are divided into three
subgroups: solvents, bases and phase agents.

```{admonition} Slot-based Representation
:class: seealso
For an alternative way to describe mixtures, see our
[slot-based representation](/examples/Mixtures/slot_based.md).
```

## Imports


```python
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
```


```python
from baybe.constraints import ContinuousLinearConstraint
from baybe.parameters import NumericalContinuousParameter
from baybe.recommenders import RandomRecommender
from baybe.searchspace import SearchSpace
```

## Parameter Setup

We start by creating lists containing our substance labels according to their
subgroups:


```python
g1 = ["Solvent1", "Solvent2"]
g2 = ["Base1", "Base2"]
g3 = ["PhaseAgent1", "PhaseAgent2"]
```

Next, we create continuous parameters describing the substance amounts for each group.
Here, the maximum amount for each substance depends on its group, i.e. we allow
adding more of a solvent compared to a base or a phase agent:


```python
p_g1_amounts = [
    NumericalContinuousParameter(name=f"{name}", bounds=(0, 80)) for name in g1
]
p_g2_amounts = [
    NumericalContinuousParameter(name=f"{name}", bounds=(0, 20)) for name in g2
]
p_g3_amounts = [
    NumericalContinuousParameter(name=f"{name}", bounds=(0, 5)) for name in g3
]
```

## Constraints Setup

Now, we set up our constraints. We start with the overall mixture constraint, ensuring
the total of all ingredients is 100%:


```python
c_total_sum = ContinuousLinearConstraint(
    parameters=g1 + g2 + g3,
    operator="=",
    coefficients=[1] * len(g1 + g2 + g3),
    rhs=100,
)
```

Additionally, we require bases make up at least 10% of the mixture:


```python
c_g2_min = ContinuousLinearConstraint(
    parameters=g2,
    operator=">=",
    coefficients=[1] * len(g2),
    rhs=10,
)
```

By contrast, phase agents should make up no more than 5%:


```python
c_g3_max = ContinuousLinearConstraint(
    parameters=g3,
    operator="<=",
    coefficients=[1] * len(g3),
    rhs=5,
)
```

## Search Space Creation

Having both parameter and constraint definitions at hand, we can create our
search space:


```python
searchspace = SearchSpace.from_product(
    parameters=[*p_g1_amounts, *p_g2_amounts, *p_g3_amounts],
    constraints=[c_total_sum, c_g2_min, c_g3_max],
)
```

## Verification of Constraints

To verify that the constraints imposed above are fulfilled, let us draw some
random points from the search space:


```python
recommendations = RandomRecommender().recommend(batch_size=10, searchspace=searchspace)
print(recommendations)
```

           Base1      Base2  PhaseAgent1  PhaseAgent2   Solvent1   Solvent2
    0  12.642820  16.403427     3.010549     1.328932  42.962503  23.651769
    1   7.026684  11.835732     0.398948     2.965536  29.046330  48.726770
    2   4.644540  12.776533     2.837812     1.433680  34.688864  43.618571
    3   8.034034  13.494721     0.376608     3.637948  14.645974  59.810715
    4   2.344543  15.150904     4.756401     0.098535   1.535851  76.113766
    5  10.126753  17.773187     1.406249     0.898260  17.524971  52.270580
    6   9.080840   8.065714     0.368327     1.449569  66.835124  14.200425
    7  19.998573   0.248272     1.045748     1.545055  29.024639  48.137712
    8  16.543904  17.066603     2.762666     1.650232  60.584160   1.392435
    9  10.898487  13.364272     2.782201     1.714760  57.803361  13.436919


Computing the respective row sums reveals the expected result:


```python
stats = pd.DataFrame(
    {
        "Total": recommendations.sum(axis=1),
        "Total_Bases": recommendations[g2].sum(axis=1),
        "Total_Phase_Agents": recommendations[g3].sum(axis=1),
    }
)
print(stats)
```

       Total  Total_Bases  Total_Phase_Agents
    0  100.0    29.046247            4.339481
    1  100.0    18.862416            3.364484
    2  100.0    17.421072            4.271492
    3  100.0    21.528755            4.014556
    4  100.0    17.495448            4.854935
    5  100.0    27.899940            2.304509
    6  100.0    17.146555            1.817896
    7  100.0    20.246845            2.590804
    8  100.0    33.610506            4.412899
    9  100.0    24.262759            4.496961



```python
assert np.allclose(stats["Total"], 100)
assert (stats["Total_Bases"] >= 10).all()
assert (stats["Total_Phase_Agents"] <= 5).all()
```